Hi,

You are completely right Peter. We still need this functionality.
My opinion is that there should be a "factory" config, that never changes, 
one current config and after an update of config, a latest config, to make 
it easy to revert to latest working.

/Jan

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Neubauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General OPS4J" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: Adding optional properties to pax-ConfigAdmin


> Hi Dave,
> we have some similar requirement for our platform at my old employer.
> There should be a default config that can be reverted to, and then the
> current state of the config should be saved across different
> invocations of the framework instance, and different states should be
> able to be saved as config snapshots. Not sure how that is solved now,
> I think Edward was involved in that?
>
> /peter
>
> On 2/23/07, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I was having a discussion with Boon Ping recently regarding optional
>> properties.
>>
>> The problem is this:
>>
>> I want to have default properties for a bundle sitting in a
>> properties file that is committed to the svn repository (as is done
>> presently).
>>
>> In addition, I want each user/developer to have the possibility of
>> using an optional properties file if they want to change any of the
>> default values. Such optional properties file would only be saved
>> locally on that developer's machine so it would not "interfere" with
>> anybody else.
>>
>> Upon startup, pax-ConfigAdmin would first check for the existence of
>> such optional file. If it exists, these would override the props of
>> the default file. Otherwise, it would use the props in the default
>> file (if any).
>>
>>
>> I think this is a reasonable use case, but Boon Ping does not.
>>
>>
>> wdyat... could something like this be a candidate for pax-ConfigAdmin?
>>
>> If so, can we go ahead and make this change?
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> general mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general 


_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to