I was on vacation, so a bit late to reply.

> 1. If it is GPL/LGPL, then that work can't be re-licensed to anything else. 
> We 
> have not made an absolute stance against GPL/LGPL, just tugging along on ALv2 
> have seemed like a balanced choice. If you intend to bring in, or start, 
> GPL/LGPL work in OPS4J, I think that is Ok, BUT we need to start making clear 
> what is what, and ensure that no IP mixups happens.

Please... noooooooo!

I would strongly protest any use of GPL, and would likely protest any
use of LGPL as well.

I think we should have the same rules as Apache in this case and remain
"business friendly".


Cheers,
Dave




_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to