Here it comes: Manifest-Version: 1.0 Archiver-Version: Plexus Archiver Created-By: Apache Maven Built-By: peter Build-Jdk: 1.5.0_07 Extension-Name: org.apache.felix.dependencymanager Specification-Title: Apache felix is an OSGi implementation. Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Implementation-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Implementation-Title: org.apache.felix.dependencymanager Implementation-Version: 0.9.0-incubator-SNAPSHOT Export-Package: org.apache.felix.dependencymanager Bundle-Version: 0.9.0.incubator-SNAPSHOT Bundle-Vendor: Apache Software Foundation Import-Package: org.osgi.framework Bundle-Name: Dependency Manager Bundle-Classpath: . Bundle-Description: A bundle that provides a run-time service dependen cy manager.
/peter On 4/22/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 22 April 2007 03:11, Peter Neubauer wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] refers to a non existing folder and it should be > > referring to a jar instead, not a folder. > > No, it should be referring to Bundle-SymbolicName and Bundle-Version. > > > I wonder if thre is any mismatch beween the bundles symbolic name and > > the conversion PaxConstruct makes because of the imported version and > > name? > > Well, that should not matter. As far as OSGi is concern I can install abc.jar, > and the framework should not use the jar in any presentation of the bundle. > Bundle-SymbolicName + Bundle-Version is a safe bet, but we see Bundle-Name on > occasions as well. > > Can you post the manifest for the dependency manager? > > > Cheers > Niclas > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
