On 5/7/07, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 04/05/07, Jeremy Volkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for the detailed reply, Raffael, and sorry for my delayed response.
> >
> > From what I can tell, Pax Construct builds OSGi-Maven projects. If
> > that is correct, then I think I'd prefer not to go down that route.
>
> Yep - Pax Construct's first use case was to quickly create OSGi project
> sandpits for demos and tutorials (so people can focus on code not build).
> Scope has expanded since then, but it's still maven based and uses the
> maven dependency system...
>

Great! That means I didn't spend my weekend playing around with Drools
for nothing. ;)

> >
> > I'm going to take a look at Loom and see if I can get it to do
> > anything for me. :) I also find myself interested in Silk, since it
> > seems to be based upon the same idea.  Perhaps it can be resurrected.
>
> Certainly - just register over at http://issues.ops4j.org and you can start
> a lab project under https://scm.ops4j.org/repos/ops4j/laboratory/users
>

Did that a year and a half ago; just haven't been very active :)

>
> --
> Cheers, Stuart
>

- Jeremy

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to