Whoa... Hi Simon,

I didn't know you monitor this list too.  Nice hearing from you!  And thanks 
for the pointer.  I'll look into it.

-- rick

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Simon Kaegi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General OPS4J" <general@lists.ops4j.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: [issues] Created: (BUNDLES-2) Jetty 6 
basedHttpServiceimplementation


> Hi guys,
> I wonder if it might be worthwhile for you to take a look at
> org.eclipse.equinox.http.servlet.
> This is the bundle that really provides the HttpService implementation for
> both the servletbridge and the Jetty 5 implementation. It exposes an
> HttpServiceServlet that if you can register using Server specific API 
> you're
> done. There's nothing Equinox specific in the bundle so it should be
> portable plus it's tested and maintained.
>
> org.eclipse.eqinox.http.jetty is probably the closest thing applicable in
> terms of demonstrating how to use it and I bet the approach taken there
> would be fairly easy to use with Jetty 6 or embedded Tomcat. A while back 
> I
> did a Jetty 6 integration which would at least show some of the API
> differences although the code would need to be updated -
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=132555
>
> There are plenty of good reasons why you might want to do a native Jetty 6
> implementation, but regardless of what you end up deciding I'll try to 
> watch
> and help where I can.
>
> -Simon
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Peter Neubauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "General OPS4J" <general@lists.ops4j.org>
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 3:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [issues] Created: (BUNDLES-2) Jetty 6 based
> HttpServiceimplementation
>
>
>> Well,
>> not sure that is that easy, since Tomcat seems not be intended for
>> embedding the same way Jetty is. However, there is the ServletBridge
>> over at Equinox, that exposes a containing Tomcat as HttpService, thus
>> making it possible to embed an OSGi framework inside a WAR. Very cool
>> and handy when integrating with existing Tomcat and enterprise
>> deployment scenarios.
>>
>> I think this is not the scope of the work proposed, but I may be wrong?
>>
>> /peter
>>
>> On 5/24/07, Rick Litton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Same here. +1
>>>
>>> Is there a possibility to branch into a Tomcat implementation as well?
>>>
>>> -- rick
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Niclas Hedhman (JIRA)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: <general@lists.ops4j.org>
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 1:49 AM
>>> Subject: [issues] Created: (BUNDLES-2) Jetty 6 based Http
>>> Serviceimplementation
>>>
>>>
>>> > Jetty 6 based Http Service implementation
>>> > -----------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> >                 Key: BUNDLES-2
>>> >                 URL: http://issues.ops4j.org/jira/browse/BUNDLES-2
>>> >             Project: Bundles
>>> >          Issue Type: New Feature
>>> >            Reporter: Niclas Hedhman
>>> >            Assignee: Niclas Hedhman
>>> >            Priority: Minor
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I think we should do a rock-solid Http Service implentation using 
>>> > Jetty
>>> > 6.0. A lot of people are talking about it, but I have not seen 
>>> > anything
>>> > materialize and it seems like a small task compared to many other
>>> > things
>>> > we want to do.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>> > -
>>> > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the 
>>> > administrators:
>>> > http://issues.ops4j.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
>>> > -
>>> > For more information on JIRA, see:
>>> > http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > general mailing list
>>> > general@lists.ops4j.org
>>> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> general mailing list
>>> general@lists.ops4j.org
>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> general mailing list
>> general@lists.ops4j.org
>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general@lists.ops4j.org
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> 



_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to