+1,
you always have to import the same 5 bundles, seems to make more sense
to just have 2.

/peter

On 6/28/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gang,
>
> Pax Logging has quite a few bundles, essentially one api, one for each
> legacy api and the service. The main purpose was to allow the service
> implementation bundle to be upgraded on the fly, without stopping any
> other bundles.
>
> Now, the legacy api bundles are really tiny, and I'm thinking of
> folding the legacy APIs into the Pax Logging API and end up with only
> two bundles. This would create a small extra overhead in the API
> bundle, but it is very small (couple of K).
>
> WDYT?
>
>
> Cheers
> Niclas
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to