Let me answer to this now :) after 2.5 months. Supported in all 3 platforms.
Alin On 6/20/07, Peter Neubauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi gang, > trying to use PaxRunner to run Equinox, but to avoid the console > option in order to be able to use the KF console, I realized that this > might be a problem. In equinox, the console subsystem sits embedded in > the framework itself and gets activated by a command line switch. In > KF and Felix, the Console/Shell subsystems are in their own bundles so > it depends on what you deploy whether they are activated or not. > > Now, talking to Niclas opens the question if we should either remove > the -console switch from the equinox runner setup and deploy the KF > console instead in order to get a consistent behaviour, or if we > should enable to pass through framework specific options such as this > switch, configuration areas etc etc? In that case, what form would be > best? > > Cheers > > /peter > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
