PAXWEB-31 is resolved.
On 9/26/07, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 18:06 +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > On Wednesday 26 September 2007 16:39, David Leangen wrote: > > > > > Mainly, resources are not getting loaded correctly. > > > > > > Who's our main Pax Web guru around here? > > > > As Alin mentions, I think we are more compliant in this field > (resources) than > > Mr Hall. I think it boils down to we are explicitly dealing with the > > resolution of aliases according to the OSGi spec, whereas I think > > org.ungoverned just delegate the entire cycle to Jetty, which isn't > exactly > > the same as Osgi spec says. > > > > Now, this could mean that Pax Wicket have hacks adjusted to the > org.ungoverned > > behavior (bad, I know) and probably time to look at these again. > > My problem is related to http://issues.ops4j.org/jira/browse/PAXWEB-31. > > > It seems that all the strange behaviours I am getting are related to > this issue. > > So, maybe the problem is not so deep as I expected. > > > Alin and I checked http and url specs, but found no mention of this. > Seems that accepting extra slashes is by convention. > > For example, in apache, jetty, etc., the following are the same: > > http://host/some/path > htpp://host///some////path > > In pax web, the first is ok, but the later gives a 404. > > Alin and I agree that we should follow conventions of other major apps. > > I believe Alin is working on fixing this now. 3 cheers for Alin! :-) > > > > Cheers, > > David > > > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
