On 21/02/2008, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> First of all, this should be asked on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Secondly, Pax Web is not "Jetty" but an implementation of the OSGi
> Http Service spec, plus various extensions. It just happen to use
> Jetty to back it. Now, IIRC, it still exports and imports (accroding
> to OSGi guidelines) the Jetty packages, so what you are sugesting
> *should* be possible. If Pax Web doesn't export+import the packages,
> then I think that is a bug and file an issue, and we will take care of
> it.


Correct - currently Pax-Web uses Jetty as a back-end to support the
HttpService plus various extensions. Looking at the Bnd instructions
and manifest, it doesn't currently import / export the Jetty packages,
but it would be really simple to change it so it does - then you could
update/supply a newer version at any point.

Cheers
> Niclas
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Brett Wooldridge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >  Is there a reason that you have chosen to include the Jetty 6 classes
> in
> > your own OSGi bundle?  Doesn't it make more sense to deploy the OSGi
> bundles
> > supplied by Jetty?  By including the classes in your bundle, users no
> longer
> > have the choice of upgrading to a newer version of Jetty 6 (possibly due
> to
> > a security issue) while remaining at the same level of OPS4j, or
> upgrading
> > OPS4j while remaining at the same level of Jetty 6.  There are also many
> > other Jetty modules, such as annotations, Java 5 threadpool, etc. which
> > user's might want to deploy along side Jetty 6.
> >
> >  So, I guess my question is, can OPS4j (pax-web-service) be refactored
> to
> > simply rely on the standard Jetty OSGi bundles rather than containing
> them?
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >  Brett Wooldridge
> >  www.ziptie.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >  infra mailing list
> >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general@lists.ops4j.org
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>



-- 
Cheers, Stuart
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to