Ok,
seems fair.

/peter

On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:10 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Gang,
>
>  The Felix project feels that Pax look to much at workarounds and not totally
>  committed in helping Felix weeding out the bugs.
>
>  So, when we find trouble with Felix, we should try to bring the issues back 
> to
>  Felix for resolution (esp if we know what it is). They would totally
>  appreciate it.
>
>  Of course, this goes for all frameworks, although we have less contact with
>  those folks.
>
>
>  Cheers
>  --
>  Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>
>  I  live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
>  I  work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
>  I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  general mailing list
>  general@lists.ops4j.org
>  http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>



-- 
GTalk:        neubauer.peter
Skype        peter.neubauer
ICQ            18762544
GTalk        neubauer.peter
Phone       +46704 106975
Mail           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer

http://www.neo4j.org     - New Energy for Data - the Netbase.
http://www.ops4j.org     - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
Participation Software.
http://www.qi4j.org        - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development.

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to