Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> So, when it comes to Configuration of the Log4J backend, Pax Logging only 
> supports that a complete "Log4J Properties File"-format is sent to the 
> SERVICE_PID="org.ops4j.pax.logging"
> I agree it is not ideal, but the only one I could come up with that gives a 
> predictable result and is "Production Setup Friendly".

Did support for:

service.pid=org.ops4j.pax.logging
Log4J-ConfigFile=file:/path/to/log4j.xml

disappear as well? I've been using the above on 0.9.5 for a while.

Cheers,
Raman


_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to