I agree with both versions and releasing to maven central repo. But lets wait a bit till we sort out the problem with optional JCL/Pax Runner.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Alin Dreghiciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Pax URL 0.3.2 and Pax Runner 0.11.0 released. >> >> I think that we should think more seriously about releasing 1.0.0 >> artifacts for all of them, meaning that we should release also Base >> and Pax Swissbox. And of course then, releasing them to Maven Central. > > Yep, I agree too. So we should release, > > Base 0.5.1-SNAPSHOT --> 1.0 > > Pax Swissbox 0.2.1-SNAPSHOT --> 1.0 > > Pax URL 0.3.2-SNAPSHOT --> 1.0 > > Pax Runner 0.11.0-SNAPSHOT --> 1.0 > > > In that order? Shall we aim for Maven Central Repo at the same time?? > > I can volunteer to do the release work, if someone write up the News > about it.... > > > Cheers > Niclas > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > -- Alin Dreghiciu http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software. http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. http://malaysia.jayway.net - New Energy for Projects - Great People working on Great Projects at Great Places _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
