On Thursday 24 July 2008 00:53, Craig Walls wrote: > The reason I think that this may be a dumb question: Maybe I don't need > Pax Runner in this scenario...maybe I just use raw Equinox. But I wonder > what I'll miss from Pax Runner when/if I do that.
We have discussed on several occassions that probably we should have a "Create Pax Runner Distro" option 'somewhere'. Maybe Pax Construct is the responsible party, perhaps it is Pax Runner itself, perhaps something else. I don't have the answer, and the work is not done yet either. As Alin points out, you could create a "repository" as part of your distro, and point Pax Runner there. If you ain't worried that the user will zap the "runner/" directory, you could zip up that one, which contains all things needed. But then, you need to prevent Pax Runner command-line options, such as 'clean'. Any suggestions on how it should/could work are most welcome. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
