Hi Craig,

As Toni mentioned there is not to much life wthin Pax Runner after the
target platform is stated.
There are 3 things you can take into consideration:
1. Target platform is started in a new process with System.exec
2. There are 3 pipes that pipes the System.in/out/err to the started process
3. There is a shutdown hook installed.

I cannot test your case as I do not have windows on my machine.
But before doing anything else try first to add the following option
to your cmdline: --noconsole

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Craig Walls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And now for something completely different...
>
> I'm trying to run Pax Runner (v0.12.0)-launched application as a Windows
> service. I'm using JSL (http://jslwin.sourceforge.net/) to install and
> run it as a service. It works, but when I start the service, the
> performance tab in the task manager says that it's using 100% of the CPU!
>
> I've tried narrowing the problem down and I've finally reached a point
> where I'm doing a VERY minimal installation of Pax Runner as a service
> (my app isn't even involved anymore...nor are its dependency bundles).
> Here's what the jsl.ini looks like:
>
>    [defines]
>    PATH = c:\myapp
>    JAVA = %JAVA_HOME%
>    PP = %PATH%
>    P1 = %P2%
>    P2 = %PP%
>    MYAPP_HOME = %PATH%
>
>    [service]
>    appname = Semantra
>    servicename = MyApp
>    displayname = MyApp
>    servicedescription = MyApp
>    stringbuffer = 16000
>    starttype=auto
>    loadordergroup=someorder
>    useconsolehandler=false
>    stopclass=java/lang/System
>    stopmethod=exit
>    stopsignature=(I)V
>    premainmethod=run
>    premainsignature=()I
>    premain.modules=threaddump
>    premain.threaddump.class=com.roeschter.jsl.ThreadDumpListener
>    premain.threaddump.method=start
>    premain.threaddump.wait=3000
>    premain.threaddump.critical=no
>    premain.threaddump.interface=127.0.0.1
>
>    [java]
>    cmdline = -jar %MYAPP_HOME%/bin/pax/pax-runner-0.12.0.jar --platform=eq
>
> The only thing non-trivial about running Pax Runner this way is that I'm
> using Equinox instead of the default Felix (I get the same results with
> Felix, btw).
>
> Again, nothing special...just a bare-bones Pax Runner. No bundles other
> than the framework bundles are involved. When I start the service, the
> CPU jumps to 100%. Actually, while it's resolving the framework bundles
> from Maven, it stays relatively low (at around 40% or less)...but once
> the framework starts, it plateaus at 100%.
>
> Note that I can run Pax Runner (with or without my app) as a non-service
> and the CPU stabilizes after a brief startup spike. I can also run
> Equinox (java -jar equinox.jar) as a service and the CPU usage remains
> low. So, the culprit seems to be Pax Runner.
>
> I don't expect that anyone listening has tried doing this before, but I
> have to ask: What could Pax Runner be doing after the framework starts
> that would cause it to consume all of the CPU when running as a Window
> service? Once the framework is started, what is there for Pax Runner to
> do? Why so busy?
>
> And...anybody have any ideas on how I could run this as a service and
> *not* use up all of the CPU?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general@lists.ops4j.org
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>



-- 
Alin Dreghiciu
http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
Participation Software.
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development.
http://malaysia.jayway.net - New Energy for Projects - Great People
working on Great Projects at Great Places

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to