On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 09:58 +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 8:15 AM, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > I want to include the org.apache.log4j.net package in the > pax-logging > product. However, to do so would require the addition of the > following > dependencies: > > - javax.jms > - javax.mail > - javax.mail.internet > - javax.naming > > I plan on just going ahead with this. If there are any > objections, > please holler. > > HOLLER!!!! > > 1. What do you mean "include... package"?? The entire Log4j 1.2.15 jar > file is part of the service bundle AFAIK. > > 2. Total -1 on including those as a dependency. I am OK with an > optional Import-Package and provide those classes in a separate bundle > (if you can get that to work).
I agree with these being provided as separate bundles via optional dependencies. I get most of the ones mentioned via the geronimo spec bundles, ie for javamail: <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId> <artifactId>geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec</artifactId> <version>1.3</version> </dependency> Matt _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
