2008/10/1 Alin Dreghiciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> I can release Pax Runner anytime if is required but I dod not see an
> issue related in 0.14.0.
>

no need, the minor fix to pax-runner was part of 0.13.0

I think Craig meant v1.4 of pax-construct - which is the other
half of the work to get WAR files built+provisioned in Maven.

On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Craig Walls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks...I somehow overlooked that issue in JIRA. I'll give it a try
> later.
> >
> > No rush, but...any idea when 0.14.0 will be final? Take your time...just
> > wondering how to best plan around this problem for the project I'm
> > working on.
> >
> >
> > Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> >> 2008/10/1 Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>     2008/10/1 Craig Walls <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> >>
> >>
> >>         More info...it seems that when "pax-provision" is scanning for
> >>         bundles
> >>         in the current project, it overlooks my WAR bundle altogether
> >>         and never
> >>         adds it to the runner/deploy-pom.xml file.
> >>
> >>
> >>     see  http://issues.ops4j.org/jira/browse/PAXCONSTRUCT-89
> >>
> >>     trunk version of the pax-plugin now adds WAR files to the
> >>     provision pom
> >>     but I can't remember if Pax-Runner has support for detecting them
> >>     - see
> >>     second from last comment at the end of that issue...
> >>
> >>
> >> actually I just checked and the fix to Pax-Runner is in 0.13.0
> >> so if you compile the trunk version of the maven-pax-plugin
> >> you should be able to deploy your WAR project
> >>
> >> ( the 1.4-SNAPSHOT is not deployed yet as I think it's still
> >>   set up for manual deployment rather than via bamboo )
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>         Is there a setting or some such thing (aside from having to
> >>         specify my
> >>         WAR bundle using deployURLs) that can make pax-provision pick
> >>         up and
> >>         deploy my WAR bundle?
> >>
> >>
> >>     unfortunately not, because even if pax-provision detected them,
> >>     there's
> >>     still the issue about Pax-Runner picking them up - it shouldn't
> >>     take long
> >>     to fix that, but it will require a new release
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers, Stuart
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> general mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > general mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Alin Dreghiciu
> http://www.ops4j.org         - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
> Participation Software.
> http://www.qi4j.org            - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven
> Development.
> http://malaysia.jayway.net - New Energy for Projects - Great People
> working on Great Projects at Great Places
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>



-- 
Cheers, Stuart
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to