> > But I thought you said just a short while ago (can't find quote, or > > maybe it was just hearsay) that Log4j sucks and that you want to > > implement your own logger in Qi4j? > > Uh, what does this got to do with Qi4j??
Nothing, sorry I confused you so easily by mentioned this word. The question I was asking was related to your plan of implementing a new logger. I wanted to make sure that I wasn't again working with something I'd have to reimplement in a year or so. > Qi4j is challenging every angle of Java development. Yes, long live Qi4j, but that's not really relevant here. > Huh??? What are you talking about? > > public interface PaxLogger > > public class PaxLoggerImpl > implements PaxLogger Never mind... I misread + miswrote. It's the service impl that has the dependency, so that does not affect me. _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
