[ 
http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXEXAM-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=11738#action_11738
 ] 

Alin Dreghiciu commented on PAXEXAM-5:
--------------------------------------

Then, I suggest that we figure this out before releasing it. I want the next 
version of Pax Exam to have quite a stable API.
I think that the @Inject is a good option and the cases explained by Edward we 
can complement it with extra info as:
@Inject @Service(Foo.class) Foo foo; which can be simplified in case that the 
service type is the same as the type of the object to @Inject @Service Foo foo;

> Allow bundlecontext injected on field basis
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PAXEXAM-5
>                 URL: http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXEXAM-5
>             Project: Pax Exam
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Edward Yakop
>            Assignee: Toni Menzel
>             Fix For: 0.3.0
>
>
> Currently you have to pass BundleContext in as a method parameter. It would 
> be nice to have a BundleContext annotation for a field like this:
> public class SimpleTest
> {
>  @BundleContext
>  private BundleContext context;
> }

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.ops4j.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to