I just tried the most recent version of pax-web-extender-whiteboard and, as far as I can see, the bundle refresh bug (http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-112) has been squashed!
Great job Alin! Thanks, Peter On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Alin Dreghiciu <[email protected]> wrote: > I just released Pax Web 0.5.2 and Pax Web Extender 0.5.0. > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Peter Gardfjäll > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Alin, >> >> it would be great to have it by the end of the week! >> >> I am working on a web application (Wicket) and I really like being >> able to refresh the web bundle from inside eclipse and have the bundle >> code updated without a server restart. This bug effectively prevents >> me from doing that. >> But I guess as a temporary workaround I can refresh the pax web >> whiteboard instead of the web bundle I want to refresh. >> (although this has the effect of reloading all my web bundles and not >> just the one I have updated). >> >> cheers, Peter >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Alin Dreghiciu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> Pax Web Extender uses new api available only in Pax Web 0.5.2, which >>> has not yet been released. If I recall correctly that is due to >>> http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-112). So, to release Pax Web >>> Extender we need first to release Pax Web 0.5.2. And in order to >>> release Pax Web I want first to finish up open issues. >>> I hope to have Pax Web/Pax Web Extender released by the end of the week. >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Peter Gardfjäll >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I was just trying out the Pax Web extender whiteboard bundle and it >>>> seems as though I have run into the following issue: >>>> >>>> http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEBEX-28 >>>> >>>> That is, when I refresh (stop and then (re)start) my Servlet-exporting >>>> bundle, it does not get republished by the whiteboard bundle. >>>> From the JIRA issue I can see that the issue has been resolved. >>>> Furthermore, all outstanding work on version 0.5.0 appears to be fixed as >>>> well. >>>> So, is there anything preventing 0.5.0 from being released? >>>> >>>> It would be great to have the issue mentioned above fixed! >>>> >>>> Thanks, Peter >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> general mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Alin Dreghiciu >>> http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open >>> Participation Software. >>> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. >>> http://www.codedragons.com - New Energy for Projects - Great People >>> working on Great Projects at Great Places >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> general mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> > > > > -- > Alin Dreghiciu > http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open > Participation Software. > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. > http://www.codedragons.com - New Energy for Projects - Great People > working on Great Projects at Great Places > Sent from: Nijmegen Ge Netherlands. > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
