Pax Runner becomeing a more and more versatile "platform" for other tools, i would like to suggest a "in-runner" solution for that. If you use Pax Runner API (like in Exam), why not ask it for available versions etc.
Otherwise this would become yet another dependency to mantain (see, a new felix then requires a new runner and new exam, at least) On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Alin Dreghiciu (JIRA) <[email protected] > wrote: > > [ > http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXEXAM-17?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel] > > Alin Dreghiciu resolved PAXEXAM-17. > ----------------------------------- > > Resolution: Fixed > > > Include Equinox 3.4.2 in allEquinoxVersions() option > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: PAXEXAM-17 > > URL: http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXEXAM-17 > > Project: Pax Exam > > Issue Type: Improvement > > Components: DefaultTestContainer > > Affects Versions: 0.3.0 > > Reporter: Alin Dreghiciu > > Assignee: Alin Dreghiciu > > Fix For: 0.3.1 > > > > > > Pax Runner added support for Equinox 3.4.2. This should be added to > allEquinoxVersions() option. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: > http://issues.ops4j.org/secure/Administrators.jspa > - > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > > > > _______________________________________________ > notify mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/notify > -- Toni Menzel Software Developer [email protected] http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software.
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
