Don't have an opinion to niclas' questions right now but would through this in: Are people coming into looking for a web framework using OSGi's dynamic
*or* looking for a osgi glue for their wicket efforts ? In ideal, Pax Wicket satisfies both but maybe its more attracting for developers to, say support a range of web frameworks in close coupling with the ucoming ModuleFusion thing ? So, building this on a platform kind of thing with high extensibility like we do in other Pax Projects. (?) Then Pax Wicket can become "one implmenttion" built on a rock solid / tested foundation. I am currently thinking about how such a foundation/platform can look like. On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote: > Gang, > I know there are some people using Pax Wicket, and with that comes > more and more 'bug discoveries', and without an active developer > community, it will lead to disappointment. Pax Wicket was an early > experiment of what one could do with the dynamic modularity that OSGi > provides, but question remains; Was it successful? > > If the answer is No, is it reasonable to keep it up and visible for > even more people to be drawn into a failed effort? > > If the answer is Yes, then we seek the people needed to grow Pax > Wicket into the next level. I am not up for it (far too busy with Qi4j > and business-in-general), but I am willing to assist anyone or group > of people who steps up and want to actively maintain and improve it. > > > Cheers > Niclas > -- > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > -- Toni Menzel Software Developer [email protected] http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software.
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
