Here's the dep and build portions of my pom:
The deps commented out are the transitive ones. Normally I shouldn't
have to include them here. But, if I don't, pax-exam won't grab them for
me.
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.osgi</groupId>
<artifactId>org.osgi.core</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.osgi</groupId>
<artifactId>org.osgi.compendium</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>net.leangen.expedition.osgi</groupId>
<artifactId>expedition_osgi_api</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.ops4j.pax.exam</groupId>
<artifactId>pax-exam</artifactId>
<version>0.4.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.ops4j.pax.exam</groupId>
<artifactId>pax-exam-junit</artifactId>
<version>0.4.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.ops4j.pax.exam</groupId>
<artifactId>pax-exam-container-default</artifactId>
<version>0.4.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>${pom.groupId}</groupId>
<artifactId>expedition_openjpa_api</artifactId>
<version>${pom.version}</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<!--dependency>
<groupId>javax.jms</groupId>
<artifactId>com.springsource.javax.jms</artifactId>
<version>1.1.0</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml.bind</groupId>
<artifactId>com.springsource.javax.xml.bind</artifactId>
<version>2.1.7</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.activation</groupId>
<artifactId>com.springsource.javax.activation</artifactId>
<version>1.1.1</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml.stream</groupId>
<artifactId>com.springsource.javax.xml.stream</artifactId>
<version>1.0.1</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.commons</groupId>
<artifactId>com.springsource.org.apache.commons.collections</artifactId>
<version>3.2.1</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.commons</groupId>
<artifactId>com.springsource.org.apache.commons.lang</artifactId>
<version>2.4.0</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.commons</groupId>
<artifactId>com.springsource.org.apache.commons.pool</artifactId>
<version>1.3.0</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>serp</groupId>
<artifactId>com.springsource.serp</artifactId>
<version>1.13.1</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>net.leangen.expedition.wrapper</groupId>
<artifactId>xml-parsers</artifactId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency-->
</dependencies>
<build>
<plugins>
<!-- use pax exam maven plugin -->
<plugin>
<groupId>org.ops4j.pax.exam</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-paxexam-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>generate-paxexam-config</id>
<goals>
<goal>generate-paxexam-config</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<configuration>
<settings>
<platform>equinox</platform>
<version>latest</version>
<profiles>log,url</profiles>
</settings>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 17:33 +0900, David Leangen wrote:
>
>
> Hey,
>
>
> Thanks for checking, but I don't understand. I am using
> the @RunWith( MavenConfiguredJUnit4TestRunner.class ), but it is not
> picking up the transitive deps. I can run mvn compile and check the
> pax-compiler dir to confirm that they are not there.
>
>
> What do you think I could be misunderstanding?
>
>
> Cheers,
> =David
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 30, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Toni Menzel wrote:
>
> > Just tried, and works just nice.
> > You need to remember that:
> > -pax exam just picks up a file from classpath that has been
> > constructed by the plugin before:
> > target/classes/META-INF/maven/paxexam-config.args
> >
> >
> > -this is a 100% valid paxrunner args file that you also could stick
> > in a regular pax runner instance.
> >
> >
> > By telling paxexam to be "configured by maven" (use
> > the @RunWith( MavenConfiguredJUnit4TestRunner.class ) )
> > it will just look for that file in classpath (and sticks that as a
> > file reference to the embedded paxrunner).
> >
> >
> > You also can check the picked up dependencies by looking into that
> > file.
> > A "mvn compile" is enough to trigger file creation (+update) but not
> > run the test immediately (in case you want to check).
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Toni Menzel <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > well they should. let me try that as well.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:57 AM, David Leangen
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ok, changed those deps to compile. You were right
> > about that.
> >
> >
> > Is there an option to also include transitive deps?
> > Otherwise, I have to add them by hand to the pom,
> > which means that the Maven stuff is only a minor
> > improvement. If all transitive deps also get
> > resolved, that would be perfect!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> > =David
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mar 30, 2009, at 4:38 PM, David Leangen wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Well...
> > >
> > >
> > > In that case, you'd better update the tutorial. I
> > > just used the config that was shown there. ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > > In any case, in the meantime I'm using the regular
> > > config (manual). The maven one would be a
> > > reaaaaaaally nice feature to have, though.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > =David
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mar 30, 2009, at 4:34 PM, Toni Menzel wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, the container is not a bundle and it
> > > > should not be provisioned to the osgi instance.
> > > > I guess you are using the maven plugin. make
> > > > sure you put it into scope != provided so its
> > > > not being picked up by exam.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > There is already a jira task to make this
> > > > configurable (which scope defindes a osgi
> > > > provisioning artifact and which is "just"
> > > > something you want/need at compiletime.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > As of bleeding edge: you should use this
> > > > 0.4-SNAPSHOT cause it contains many new features
> > > > and should be released once paxrunner gets out.
> > > > Although i experienced some "anomalies"
> > > > yesterday with the new bnd version in pax url. -
> > > > never mind. But will have a look again at this.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Edward Yakop
> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 13:55, David
> > > > Leangen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Any ideas?
> > > > >
> > > > > Caused by:
> > > > org.ops4j.pax.runner.platform.PlatformException:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > [file:/home/owner/.m2/repository/org/ops4j/pax/exam/pax-e
> > > > >
> > > >
> > xam-container-default/0.4.0-SNAPSHOT/pax-exam-container-default-0.4.0-SNAPSHOT.jar]
> > is not a valid bundle
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > org.ops4j.pax.runner.platform.internal.PlatformImpl.validateBundleAndGetFilename(PlatformImpl.java:721)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > org.ops4j.pax.runner.platform.internal.PlatformImpl.download(PlatformImpl.java:602)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > org.ops4j.pax.runner.platform.internal.PlatformImpl.downloadBundles(PlatformImpl.java:375)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > org.ops4j.pax.runner.platform.internal.PlatformImpl.start(PlatformImpl.java:173)
> > > > > at
> > > >
> > org.ops4j.pax.runner.Run.startPlatform(Run.java:578)
> > > > > ... 26 more
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bleeding edge.. I like it :)
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Edward Yakop
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > general mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Toni Menzel
> > > > Software Developer
> > > > Professional Profile: http://www.osgify.com
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS
> > > > Communities - Open Participation Software.
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > general mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > general mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > general mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Toni Menzel
> > Software Developer
> > Professional Profile: http://www.osgify.com
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities -
> > Open Participation Software.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Toni Menzel
> > Software Developer
> > Professional Profile: http://www.osgify.com
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
> > Participation Software.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > general mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
