2009/4/10 Alin Dreghiciu <[email protected]> > Im planning one more release bore releasing to 1.0.0. This wil > include parallel provisioning scanning and file downloads. If that > goes well, without any big issues I'm good to go for 1.0.0. > Shall we then release also projects that we depend to as 1.0.0? Not > really necessary but good to have. >
I think so, because there's not much churn in the base projects now also releasing them one-by-one as 1.0 means we can start pushing them onto the central repository rather than doing it all in one go... > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Alin Dreghiciu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'm planning to release Px Runner 0.18.0 tonight. > >> Anyone against that? > > > > When is it time for 1.0 ?? > > > > > > Cheers > > -- > > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java > > > > I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er > > I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc > > I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug > > > > _______________________________________________ > > general mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > > > -- > Alin Dreghiciu > http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open > Participation Software. > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. > Looking for a job. > Sent from Cluj-Napoca, CJ, Romania > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > -- Cheers, Stuart
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
