Here is my +1. On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Alin Dreghiciu <adreghi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I was thinking thsi days that we should merge Pax Web and Pax Web > Extender into one project Pax Web. Reasons I see: > > * People (users) does not make a distinction about the two > * Even if the projects were split in order to make a distinction that > Pax Web Extender can be used without Pax Web I do not know about such > usage > * Pax Web will become a stronger brand > * If we are about implementing RFC-66 having them in one project will > be easier to handle/maintain. > * Less maintenance > > So, lets vote: > [] +1 - merge > [] 0 - no opinion > [] -1 - keep them as now > > -- > Alin Dreghiciu > http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open > Participation Software. > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. > Looking for a job. > Sent from Cluj-Napoca, CJ, Romania >
-- Alin Dreghiciu http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software. http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. Looking for a job. Sent from Cluj-Napoca, CJ, Romania _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
