Great post Craig, thanks for mentioning PAX and OPS4J! /peter
GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer http://www.neo4j.org - New Energy for Data - The Graph Database. http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software. http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:57 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Pax Tools on dzone.com > > News Item edited by Toni Menzel > > Craig Walls once more gives Pax Tools a great > review:http://java.dzone.com/articles/dozen-osgi-myths-and > > There's also a huge set of OSGi tools available from the OPS4J Pax project. > I've already reviewed these tools on this blog, so I won't go into it again > here. Suffice it to say that many of the Pax tools have become indispensable > in my OSGi development toolbox. I'm particularly fond of Pax Construct, Pax > Runner, Pax Exam, and Pax URL. You can count on me blogging more about the > Pax tools soon. > > Of the three testing frameworks listed, I tend to favor Pax Exam because > it's currently the only one that is based on JUnit 4. Pax Drone is > effectively deprecated in favor of Pax Exam, so unless you encounter a > project that's already using it, you should disregard it. As for Spring-DM's > testing support, it is nice in that it uses Spring autowiring to autowire > OSGi services into a test class. But until it's based on JUnit 4, I still > prefer Pax Exam. > > Change Notification Preferences > View Online | View Change | Add Comment > _______________________________________________ > notify mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/notify > > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
