Looks like the problem is fixed. At least the CI builds (which was the signal for thew problem) are working just fine now.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Tonny Kohar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Gangs, > >> we have problems with both the primary and the secondary DNS servers > >> at the moment. A lot of the services are currently down due to this. > >> > > > > Is this still under progress or already fixed ? > > I am not sure. We are observing very strange behavior on the DNS server > (srv03). > > For instance, even though srv03 is using its own bind9 server as the > client DNS provider, we sometimes get that a ops4j.org domain name can > not be resolved (srv03 is the master and authorative DNS server for > the domain/zone). That should be impossible. > > So, the attitude right now is a little bit, wait and see if we can see > any patterns in what works and what doesn't. > > > Cheers > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java > > I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er > I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc > I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev > -- Alin Dreghiciu http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software. http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. Looking for a job. -- Alin Dreghiciu http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software. http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. Looking for a job. Sent from Cluj-Napoca, CJ, Romania
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
