Well, it seems as if parent POMs are not considered. Right? 2009/4/28 Heiko Seeberger <[email protected]>
> Oh my god: Really great! > > 2009/4/28 Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> > >> 2009/4/29 Heiko Seeberger <[email protected]> >> >>> Hi, >>> Wouldn't that be nice: When provisioning Pax Runner with a Maven URL not >>> only the specified bundle/JAR is installed, but also the dependent >>> bundles/JARs. >>> >>> E.g. pax-run.sh >>> --autoWrap scan-bundle:mvn:net.liftweb/lift-util/1.1-SNAPSHOT will not only >>> install lift-util but also commons-collections, commons-codec, etc. (all >>> dependencies in the POM and parent POMs). >>> >>> Would that be possible? >>> >> >> isn't that already possible with scan-pom? http://wiki.ops4j.org/x/GYA6 >> >> try: pax-run.sh --autoWrap >> scan-pom:mvn:net.liftweb/lift-util/1.1-SNAPSHOT/pom >> >> Heiko >>> -- >>> www.heikoseeberger.name >>> OSGi on Scala: www.scalamodules.org >>> Lift, the simply functional web framework: http://liftweb.net >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> general mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, Stuart >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> > > > -- > www.heikoseeberger.name > OSGi on Scala: www.scalamodules.org > Lift, the simply functional web framework: http://liftweb.net > -- www.heikoseeberger.name OSGi on Scala: www.scalamodules.org Lift, the simply functional web framework: http://liftweb.net
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
