Can't we change it to use a specific version of the log profile?

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 14:42, Alin Dreghiciu <[email protected]> wrote:
> The second log profile is coming from spring 2.5.6 profile that includes a
> log profile: http://tinyurl.com/ceeu6r
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Great, thx for the tip.
>> I've committed this change along with adding those profiles has maven
>> dependencies to cache them.
>> I still have some lag on the last line of the following log output:
>>
>> 13:04:00,817 | INFO  | main             | ProvisionServiceImpl
>>    | on.internal.ProvisionServiceImpl   85 | Scan bundles from
>> [scan-bundle:mvn:org.junit/com.springsource.org.junit/4....@1]
>> 13:04:00,817 | INFO  | main             | ProvisionServiceImpl
>>    | on.internal.ProvisionServiceImpl   85 | Scan bundles from
>> [scan-bundle:mvn:org.ops4j.pax.exam/pax-exam-container-rbc/0....@1]
>> 13:04:00,817 | INFO  | main             | ProvisionServiceImpl
>>    | on.internal.ProvisionServiceImpl   85 | Scan bundles from
>> [scan-composite:mvn:org.ops4j.pax.runner.profiles/log/1.3.0/composite]
>> 13:04:00,818 | INFO  | main             | ProvisionServiceImpl
>>    | on.internal.ProvisionServiceImpl   85 | Scan bundles from
>> [scan-bundle:mvn:org.ops4j.pax.logging/pax-logging-api/1.3.0]
>> 13:04:00,821 | INFO  | main             | ProvisionServiceImpl
>>    | on.internal.ProvisionServiceImpl   85 | Scan bundles from
>> [scan-bundle:mvn:org.ops4j.pax.logging/pax-logging-service/1.3.0]
>> 13:04:00,822 | INFO  | main             | ProvisionServiceImpl
>>    | on.internal.ProvisionServiceImpl   85 | Scan bundles from
>>
>> [scan-composite:mvn:org.ops4j.pax.runner.profiles/felix.config/1.0.10/composite]
>> 13:04:00,823 | INFO  | main             | ProvisionServiceImpl
>>    | on.internal.ProvisionServiceImpl   85 | Scan bundles from
>> [scan-bundle:mvn:org.apache.felix/org.apache.felix.configadmin/1.0.10]
>> 13:04:00,824 | INFO  | main             | ProvisionServiceImpl
>>    | on.internal.ProvisionServiceImpl   85 | Scan bundles from
>>
>> [scan-composite:mvn:org.ops4j.pax.runner.profiles/spring.dm/1.2.0-rc1/composite]
>> 13:04:00,824 | INFO  | main             | ProvisionServiceImpl
>>    | on.internal.ProvisionServiceImpl   85 | Scan bundles from
>> [scan-composite:mvn:org.ops4j.pax.runner.profiles/spring/2.5.6/composite]
>> 13:04:00,826 | INFO  | main             | ProvisionServiceImpl
>>    | on.internal.ProvisionServiceImpl   85 | Scan bundles from
>> [scan-composite:mvn:org.ops4j.pax.runner.profiles/log//composite]
>>
>>
>> For some reason, the log profile is included twice: once with the full
>> version (which resolution is fast) and a second one without any
>> version (which hangs a bit) ...  Any idea ?
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:59, Alin Dreghiciu <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > If your change your configuration from Karaf itests to:
>> > logProfile().version( "1.3.0" ),
>> > profile( "felix.config" ).version( "1.0.8" ),
>> > profile( "spring.dm" ).version( "1.2.0-rc1" ),
>> > You will see a big improvement in speed.
>> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I noticed that when running pax exam tests, there is a delay while
>> >> scanning profiles.
>> >> My understanding is that the profiles are actually grabbed from the
>> >> pax-runner repository at:
>> >>    http://scm.ops4j.org/repos/ops4j/projects/pax/runner-repository/
>> >> Is there any way to make sure those profile are available locally by
>> >> using maven dependencies ?
>> >> I think this would ensure that:
>> >>  * those profiles are available while offline
>> >>  * speed up the provisioning by not scanning the remote repo
>> >>
>> >> Thoughts ?
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >> ------------------------
>> >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> ------------------------
>> >> Open Source SOA
>> >> http://fusesource.com
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> general mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Alin Dreghiciu
>> > Software Developer - Looking for new projects!
>> > My profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alindreghiciu
>> > My blog: http://adreghiciu.blogspot.com
>> > http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
>> > Participation
>> > Software.
>> > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development.
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > general mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> general mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
>
> --
> Alin Dreghiciu
> Software Developer - Looking for new projects!
> My profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alindreghiciu
> My blog: http://adreghiciu.blogspot.com
> http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation
> Software.
> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development.
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to