Forgot to mention. Did that also and I closed the Pax Web Extender project (no issues can be created anymore).Builds still to do = remove the extender builds. Thanx.
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com> wrote: > merge jira tasks (if any) and consolidate projects. > Same for bamboo builds. > > > On 5/27/09, Alin Dreghiciu <adreghi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I consider now that the merging of Pax Web Extender into Pax Web is done. > > This means that:* sources moved > > * poms and related names changed > > * documentation copied (when we release 0.7.0 of PAx Web I will remove > the > > old pages) > > > > What is left is a news item. Do you guys see something else related to be > > done? > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Alin Dreghiciu <adreghi...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > >> Took a month or so and a couple of days ago I merged Pax Web Extender > into > >> Pax Web.Now, next question is. Shall I also rename the group id from > >> org.ops4j.pax.web-extender to org.ops4j.pax.web? > >> In my view I should do that, so, if you do not agree, make some noise :) > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Alin Dreghiciu > >> <adreghi...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> > >>> Hi guys, > >>> > >>> I was thinking thsi days that we should merge Pax Web and Pax Web > >>> Extender into one project Pax Web. Reasons I see: > >>> > >>> * People (users) does not make a distinction about the two > >>> * Even if the projects were split in order to make a distinction that > >>> Pax Web Extender can be used without Pax Web I do not know about such > >>> usage > >>> * Pax Web will become a stronger brand > >>> * If we are about implementing RFC-66 having them in one project will > >>> be easier to handle/maintain. > >>> * Less maintenance > >>> > >>> So, lets vote: > >>> [] +1 - merge > >>> [] 0 - no opinion > >>> [] -1 - keep them as now > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Alin Dreghiciu > >>> http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open > >>> Participation Software. > >>> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. > >>> Looking for a job. > >>> Sent from Cluj-Napoca, CJ, Romania > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Alin Dreghiciu > >> Software Developer - Looking for new projects! > >> My profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alindreghiciu > >> My blog: http://adreghiciu.blogspot.com > >> http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open > Participation > >> Software. > >> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Alin Dreghiciu > > Software Developer - Looking for new projects! > > My profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alindreghiciu > > My blog: http://adreghiciu.blogspot.com > > http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open > Participation > > Software. > > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. > > > > > -- > Toni Menzel > Independent Software Developer > Professional Profile: http://okidokiteam.com > t...@okidokiteam.com > http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open > Participation Software. > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > -- Alin Dreghiciu Software Developer - Looking for new projects! My profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alindreghiciu My blog: http://adreghiciu.blogspot.com http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software. http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development.
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
