Sorry. I can't. looks like there is some maintenance going on so I can't reply.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Thomas Diesler <thomas.dies...@jboss.com>wrote: > Hi Alin, > > would you like to post this to our dev forum so it can benefit many? > > http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewforum&f=256 > > I'm happy to answer there. > > cheers > -thomas > > On 10/19/2009 09:37 AM, Alin Dreghiciu wrote: > > Thomas, > Thanx for sharing. > > Regarding Pax Exam and Husky these two frameworks are almost the same. > And both are working with an remote framework. Remote meaning that the > Client Runner and Osgi Framework are running in separate processes. Now, of > course that we do not share the same names like Conecor, invoker, bridge but > architecture wise is the same. With one diff: we consider that all the tests > have to run the osgi container and so we do not have the Bridge part in > every test method. In rest, all the things like extender based on manifest > headers, injection of bundle context, ... > I would even say that Pax Exam adds more to the table because you can > configure the osgi framework use for tests for things like system > properties, boot delegation packages, system packages, provisioned bundles, > ... IT may be that Husky supports that too but was not obvious from the blog > post. > > After all, I do not really care if there are other test frameworks over > there beside the split effort. As it looks like we think alike why don't you > join us? Pax Exam provides an extension point where you can plug in another > test container , beside pax runner based one. Implement that based on JBoss > and just have it in the classpath and your pax exam tests will be running in > JBoss. > > Actually the collaboration could be batter as we can work on adding > support for JBoss in Pax Runner. This will mean that jboss can be easy > started and used by pax runner users, directly used in Pax Exam without the > need to implement the container explained above, could be used n Eclipse via > Pax Runner plugin, ... WDYT? > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Ales Justin <ales.jus...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I still don't get the point of those tools. I think it's time to clarify >>> some assumptions of PaxRunner/Exam like "Pax-Exam does not support the >>> notion of remote OSGi Framework" on a Reply Post. >>> >> >> Yep, feel free to ask such questions. >> As I know Thomas (Diesler) would be more than happy to answer it. ;-) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> general@lists.ops4j.org >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> > > > > -- > Alin Dreghiciu > Software Developer > My profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alindreghiciu > My blog: http://adreghiciu.blogspot.com > http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation > Software. > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. > > > -- > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Thomas Diesler > JBoss OSGi Lead > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > -- Alin Dreghiciu Software Developer My profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alindreghiciu My blog: http://adreghiciu.blogspot.com http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software. http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development.
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
