[
http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXLOGGING-65?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13215#action_13215
]
Niclas Hedhman commented on PAXLOGGING-65:
------------------------------------------
IIUIC, this is an equivalent of PAXLOGGING-58.
See my argument over there, why I maintain that this is both a bad idea and
fixing the wrong problem.
> JCL LogFactory.FACTORY_DEFAULT points to non-existent LogFactory
> implementation
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PAXLOGGING-65
> URL: http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXLOGGING-65
> Project: Pax Logging
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: API
> Affects Versions: 1.4
> Reporter: Jarek Gawor
> Assignee: Niclas Hedhman
> Attachments: PAXLOGGING-65.patch
>
>
> The LogFactory.FACTORY_DEFAULT constant exported via JCL API points to
> non-existent LogFactory implementation. I ran into a library that tries to
> instantiate the LogFactory implementation using that constant. And that
> obviously fails as there is no such class present in the bundle.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.ops4j.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
