Hi Niclas Your mail with the two reply-to headers is indeed useful, adding one myself to this one. It seems like a good work-around for such lists, still a work-around. In general I agree with:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html I don't see where an effort is needed to set up client properly, personally I just use default thunderbird and nokia mail client which both give the option to reply to all. Cheers, Reto Niclas Hedhman said the following on 11/18/2009 12:18 PM: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Sorry for the late reply, I hate lists with Reply-to header munging as >> it doesn't allow to prioritize direct reply to posts. >> > > Please clarify what you think is proper. > > Without any Reply-To management at all, the "Reply" will send back to > the original poster (unless that particular individual has taken an > effort to set up his client properly == unusual), which really buggers > me... > > > Cheers > -- Reto Bachmann-Gmür trialox.org Tel: +41445005015 _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
