Hi,

I just created an example and updated your issue:
http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-176

On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Stéphane Jeanjean <
stephane.jeanj...@softeam.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Nobody has an idea where to put the jetty.xml file in the jar file to use a
> new default configuration ?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stéphane
>
> Stéphane Jeanjean a écrit :
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I try to find a way to configure Jetty.
>> Do you think I can change the default Jetty configuration in the jar file
>> ? When I try to open the pax-web-jetty-bundle-0.7.1.jar file, I can't find a
>> jetty.xml configuration file :( Could I add such a file ? In which directory
>> ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Stéphane
>>
>>
>> Stéphane Jeanjean a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>> I tried to provision my fragment before pax web, the behaviour is the
>>> same :(
>>> I'm unable to change the state of the fragment, it keeps "Installed"
>>> So I have created a jira issue (
>>> http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-176 )
>>>
>>> Alin Dreghiciu a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Did you tried to provision your jetty config fragment before pax web? I
>>>> mean the order they are installed/started.
>>>>
>>>> If this doe snot work, create a jira issue for it and I wil handle this
>>>> in a different way. I did not payed to much attention to this way of
>>>> configuring jetty till now. It was contributed (thanks!) by community.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Stéphane Jeanjean <
>>>> stephane.jeanj...@softeam.com <mailto:stephane.jeanj...@softeam.com>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>    Hello,
>>>>
>>>>    So, is there no way to configure Jetty with Felix today ?
>>>>
>>>>    Stéphane
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    Richard S. Hall a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>        On 9/30/09 12:17, Stéphane Jeanjean wrote:
>>>>
>>>>            Richard S. Hall a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>                On 9/30/09 11:43, Stéphane Jeanjean wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                    Richard S. Hall a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>                        On 9/30/09 11:11, Filippo Diotalevi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                            On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Stéphane
>>>>                            Jeanjean
>>>>                            <stephane.jeanj...@softeam.com
>>>>                            <mailto:stephane.jeanj...@softeam.com>>
>>>>                             wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                                With Pax Runner 1.2.0, so Felix 2.0.0,
>>>>                                I have the same behaviour : it seems
>>>>                                my jetty configuration is not used and
>>>>                                I can see the log "configure using
>>>>                                bundleresource://54/jetty.xml"
>>>>
>>>>                                I can see my Fragment in "ps" as
>>>>                                Installed (as I can see it with the
>>>>                                previous version)
>>>>                                A log message is displayed
>>>>                                "Auto-properties start:
>>>>                                org.osgi.framework.BundleException:
>>>>                                Fragment bundles can
>>>>                                not be started." (as I can see it with
>>>>                                the previous version) But I think
>>>>                                it's normal.
>>>>
>>>>                            Hi,
>>>>                              the message is normal (you cannot start
>>>>                            a fragment), but the
>>>>                            fragment should be Resolved (not just
>>>>                            Installed).
>>>>
>>>>                            Can you try to force the fragment
>>>>                            resolution ($ resolve<pid>  ) to see
>>>>                            if there's a problem with fragment
>>>>                            dependencies?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                        Make sure the host isn't already resolved
>>>>                        before trying to resolve the fragment too,
>>>>                        since if it is then it won't be possible to
>>>>                        resolve the fragment.
>>>>
>>>>                    When I try to resolve it with "resolve pid" in the
>>>>                    console, it seems that nothing happens (no
>>>>                    message). The state in "ps" keeps to "Installed".
>>>>                    What do you mean by "host isn't already resolved",
>>>>                    which host we are talking about ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                The host to which the fragment will attach. If its
>>>>                host is already resolved, then it cannot attach to it.
>>>>                It seems like it should print a message in that case...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>            When I type "resolve pid" using the shell, Pax web state
>>>>            is "Active"
>>>>
>>>>            Pax web is started automatically because I'm using web
>>>>            profile through pax runner. So perhaps when my fragment is
>>>>            deployed using deployURLs option, Pax Web is already started
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        That is quite possibly the issue. It needs to be installed
>>>>        before Pax Web is resolved.
>>>>
>>>>        I believe Equinox supports dynamic attachment of fragments,
>>>>        but this isn't required by the spec I believe, so relying on
>>>>        it is non-portable. Even then, dynamic attachment is more
>>>>        restricted than resolve-time attachment, so it still doesn't
>>>>        work in all situations that resolve-time attachment does.
>>>>
>>>>        -> richard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>            Stéphane
>>>>
>>>>            _______________________________________________
>>>>            general mailing list
>>>>            general@lists.ops4j.org <mailto:general@lists.ops4j.org>
>>>>            http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        _______________________________________________
>>>>        general mailing list
>>>>        general@lists.ops4j.org <mailto:general@lists.ops4j.org>
>>>>        http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>>    general mailing list
>>>>    general@lists.ops4j.org <mailto:general@lists.ops4j.org>
>>>>    http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alin Dreghiciu
>>>> Software Developer
>>>> My profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alindreghiciu
>>>> My blog: http://adreghiciu.blogspot.com
>>>> http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
>>>> Participation Software.
>>>> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development.
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> general mailing list
>>>> general@lists.ops4j.org
>>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general@lists.ops4j.org
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>



-- 
Alin Dreghiciu
Software Developer
My profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alindreghiciu
My blog: http://adreghiciu.wordpress.com
http://sonatype.com - Sonatype - The Maven Company
http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation
Software.
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development.
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to