On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Johan Lindquist <jo...@kawoo.co.uk> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Have vague memories about a mail a while ago about pinning the plugin > versions used by the mater pom. Not a bad idea in my opinion - any > objections against me doing this in the next version of the pom (which i > am fixing to sort out the checkstyle and site version changes already)? That is probably a good idea. There is a general tendency that rebuilding an old project that didn't nail down the versions of everything is troublesome at best, and outright impossible at worst. Having all plugins nailed down version wise seems like a safe bet for future compatibility. Downside, more versions to maintain, but perhaps the master pom approach is good enough to make this less of a concern. Alin? Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
