Oh, crap... thank you :)
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 01:20:58AM +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Did you mean this to go to list? > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:52:41AM +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > >> At work we can use GIT if we want to, but there seems to be "huge" > >> issues regarding running GIT on Windows. I have not put myself into > >> what the issues are, so not totally sure. > > > > Can't share this experience, working on some projects where about half of > > the commiters using W7 with cygwin or mysysgit > > (the others are using linux) and both have no problems (in case line > > endings are handled correctly) > > > > kind regards, > > andreas > > > >> > >> Does anyone has insights of what this might be?? > >> > >> Cheers > >> Niclas > >> > >> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com> wrote: > >> > Hi guys, > >> > OPS4J currently only allows source code to be hosted on the own ops4j SVN > >> > repository. > >> > The benefits of GIT can be read elsewhere, at least you probably have > >> > heard,it is not the worst thing in OSS history. > >> > Regarding that topic, i have some questions to the community: > >> > 1. > >> > Would you think GIT to be a worthy second SCM for developers at OPS4J ? > >> > 2. > >> > Sure, there should be also a trustworthy central point, even though git a > >> > de-central. > >> > I would propose Github.com as a valid ops4j git host because of: > >> > - taking away infrastructure issues from our own servers > >> > - broaden visibility > >> > - Github for Organizations sounds just right [1] > >> > - its just a good tool (web) > >> > Of cause, this may not be without drawbacks (not 100% about for example > >> > community integrity). > >> > Also git does not have the adoption svn has, yet. > >> > 3. > >> > How could that work ? > >> > Well, existing projects can be imported with full history. The svn repo > >> > should then be removed, a README file pointing to the new repo should > >> > replace it. > >> > Documentation,Mailinglist,Issues,CI build, Releases using > >> > oss.sonatype.org > >> > all that will stay the same. > >> > In order to test what i ask for, there is already a github organization > >> > account "OPS4J" with some pax projects imported. [2] > >> > Tell me what you guys think! > >> > Toni > >> > [1] http://github.com/blog/674-introducing-organizations > >> > [2] http://github.com/ops4j > >> > -- > >> > Toni Menzel || http://okidokiteam.com > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > general mailing list > >> > general@lists.ops4j.org > >> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > >> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java > >> > >> I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er > >> I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc > >> I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> general mailing list > >> general@lists.ops4j.org > >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > > > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java > > I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er > I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc > I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
pgpM8sIf6hiWi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
