I would say that going for GitHub *lowers* the barrier, because all the cool kids already have got a GitHub account ;-)
On 13 September 2010 19:16, Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com> wrote: > There is now a huge barrier to take when changing software: > > - (* I create an account at OPS4J ) > + (* I create an account at Github ) > * I check out the code. > * I modify. > * I commit. > > I think you argue about github, not git itself, correct ? > Its a game of evaluating benefits vs. higher barrier. > If there is a good server git/gitosis hoster that can be bound to the ops4j > crowd + it gives the almost zero barrier tooling (web!) .. here we go. > > On the other hand, playing with git and using github does not make you a > worse OSS player. - even the other way around. So you are "pushing" people > to the good side.. > > (.. trying to get myself out of this nifty situation here ..) > > Toni > > > > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org>wrote: > >> Can you elaborate a bit on the intended workflow across the "No >> barrier"-principle of OPS4J?? >> >> Start from "I am nobody..." >> >> Currently, the minimal steps are; >> * I create an account at OPS4J >> * I check out the code. >> * I modify. >> * I commit. >> * The community sees the commit and hits me on the head... ;-) >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com> >> wrote: >> > No, unfortunately not. >> > To checkout and work "forked" you don't need any account though. >> > For pushing to the ops4j repo, one needs to have a github account. >> > This automatically gives (should) you write access. >> > Thats probably a drawback. But i guess most oss people already have an >> > account there and come to ops4j afterwards. >> > >> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Looks quite good, but one open question: >> >> >> >> What is the future workflow? The ops4j accounts where directly mapped >> to >> >> the >> >> SVN accounts with commit rights. I'm not sure if this is possible with >> >> github >> >> (is it?). >> >> >> >> kind regards, >> >> andreas >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 01:09:27PM +0200, Toni Menzel wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > as a first try, i just imported the following projects into the >> new >> >> > GitHub home: >> >> > >> >> > Pax URL >> >> > >> >> > old: [1]http://scm.ops4j.org/repos/ops4j/projects/pax/url >> >> > new: [2]http://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url >> >> > Pax Runner >> >> > old: [3]http://scm.ops4j.org/repos/ops4j/projects/pax/runner >> >> > new: [4]http://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.runner >> >> > Pax Exam >> >> > old: [5]http://scm.ops4j.org/repos/ops4j/projects/pax/exam >> >> > new: [6]http://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.exam1 >> >> > The old repos are still there, probably not readonly yet, but will >> >> > be. >> >> > If an issue comes up with it, we always can go back. >> >> > Also, if a given or potential OPS4J contributor experiences >> >> > difficulties with that move (let it be personal or technical) >> please >> >> > do >> >> > not hesitate to shout. >> >> > Toni >> >> > -- >> >> > Toni Menzel || [7]http://okidokiteam.com >> >> > >> >> > References >> >> > >> >> > 1. http://scm.ops4j.org/repos/ops4j/projects/pax/url >> >> > 2. http://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url >> >> > 3. http://scm.ops4j.org/repos/ops4j/projects/pax/runner >> >> > 4. http://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.runner >> >> > 5. http://scm.ops4j.org/repos/ops4j/projects/pax/exam >> >> > 6. http://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.exam1 >> >> > 7. http://okidokiteam.com/ >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > general mailing list >> >> > general@lists.ops4j.org >> >> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> general mailing list >> >> general@lists.ops4j.org >> >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Toni Menzel || http://okidokiteam.com >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > general mailing list >> > general@lists.ops4j.org >> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer >> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java >> >> I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er >> I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc >> I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug >> > > > > -- > *Toni Menzel || **http://okidokiteam.com* > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > -- Heiko Seeberger Company: weiglewilczek.com Blog: heikoseeberger.name Follow me: twitter.com/hseeberger OSGi on Scala: scalamodules.org Lift, the simply functional web framework: liftweb.net Akka - Simpler Scalability, Fault-Tolerance, Concurrency & Remoting through Actors: akkasource.org
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
