Well i personally like that idea as it also nicely shows the advantages and drawbacks of the "process" we may apply on it..
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd like to relate this discussion to the svn/git discussion. > In such cases, I think it would be much easier if we were using git. > Achim could create a branch, commit, ask for review and later merge. > It seems to me that it makes things way easier to checkout rather than > having to apply a patch for reviewal. Also, the patch can become > huge, whereas a branch can contain many small fixes. > > I wonder if we should switch pax-web to github asap and do a 1.8.0 > release there when the times come. > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:31, Achim Nierbeck <achim.nierb...@ptv.de> > wrote: > > Well, currentyl I'm working on parsing the web.xml (done that) > transfering these Information into the Model (almost done) and wan't to > configure the httpContext. > > Yesterday I saw that if it is a secured OSGi bundle there is some code > for getting the ApplicationSecurityContext (or something like that, I'm at > work and I don't have the code in front of me:) ) > > Now I'm unsure if I should make up an OSGi-Like SecurityContext or if I > should go on with my first Idea to configure the standard httpContext like > the Jetty normaly would do. > > > > BTW, I think it will be rather large, I alread have touched about 5-8 > existing classes and added about 5-8 new ones :) > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: general-boun...@lists.ops4j.org [mailto: > general-boun...@lists.ops4j.org] Im Auftrag von Niclas Hedhman (JIRA) > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. September 2010 21:23 > > An: general@lists.ops4j.org > > Betreff: [issues] Commented: (PAXWEB-210) Security Constraints for > WebApplications > > > > > > [ > http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13520#action_13520] > > > > Niclas Hedhman commented on PAXWEB-210: > > --------------------------------------- > > > > If the code change is large, I suggest that the solution is brought up on > mailing list first, for feedback. > > > > If it is not large, commit and highlight the change in an after-the-fact > mail works good enough I think. > > > >> Security Constraints for WebApplications > >> ---------------------------------------- > >> > >> Key: PAXWEB-210 > >> URL: http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-210 > >> Project: Pax Web > >> Issue Type: Improvement > >> Components: War Extender, Web Container, Whiteboard Extender > >> Affects Versions: 0.7.1, 0.7.2 > >> Reporter: Achim Nierbeck > >> Assignee: Alin Dreghiciu > >> > >> Currently it is not possible to configure a security-constraint for any > kind of web application served by pax-web. > >> Therefore no Authentication is possible with pax-web :( > >> If I'm running pax-web with the Apache Karaf server there is even an > JAAS realm I would like to connect to. > > > > -- > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > > - > > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: > http://issues.ops4j.org/secure/Administrators.jspa > > - > > For more information on JIRA, see: > http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > general mailing list > > general@lists.ops4j.org > > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > _______________________________________________ > > general mailing list > > general@lists.ops4j.org > > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > -- *Toni Menzel || **http://okidokiteam.com*
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
