[
http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXEXAM-191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13643#action_13643
]
Toni Menzel commented on PAXEXAM-191:
-------------------------------------
I commented on the original pull request about the unknown author
(https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.exam1/pull/2):
"The Unknown author is really not good. I think we can live with that for now
but think we will roll back commits without valid github author references in
the future."
> RMI registry needs to be created inside PaxRunnerTestContainer instead of
> being created inside container-rbc's Activator
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PAXEXAM-191
> URL: http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXEXAM-191
> Project: Pax Exam
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Default Test Container
> Reporter: Bartosz Kowalewski
> Assignee: Bartosz Kowalewski
>
> Right know choosing port for RMI and creating RMI registry works like this:
> 1. The process that launches the test creates a server socket to check if a
> port is free. This is done using FreePort.
> 2. The Activator creates RMI registry.
> 3. The process that launches the test looks the registry up.
> Proposed this approch:
> 1. The process that launches the test creates a registry on a free port.
> 2. The Activator looks the registry up.
> This JIRA issue is dedicated to tracking this given enhancement separately.
> However, a fix for this issue will also fix PAXEXAM-174 and probably cause
> status of PAXEXAM-181 to be changed to 'won't fix'.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.ops4j.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
