Thanks Niclas for the Qi4j pointer. The svn projects that have been moved have a big "DEPRECATED" file in their root svn folder. You think thats enough ?
If so, i think its best to make them read only now, as it just can get worse (someone committing to the svn repo). (?) thanks a lot!! On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote: > FYI, > The "sister project" Qi4j has also moved to GitHub, but we were > running Git since early 2009 on OPS4J infrastructure, so our > transition was minor... > > Let me know, if/when you want the SVN authorization to be read-only. > Mind you, you should probably put in a big NOTICE that the sources are > now elsewhere. > > Cheers > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Toni Menzel <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> this is just a pointer to the updated documentation regarding our SCM >> situation: http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/ops4j/Source+Control+System >> >> Once we think this is "good enough" we chould make the github projects >> (Pax Runner,Pax Web,Pax URL and Pax Exam currently) readonly in SVN >> (?) . >> >> -- >> Toni Menzel || http://okidokiteam.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> > > > > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java > > I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er > I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc > I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug > -- Toni Menzel || http://okidokiteam.com _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
