Great, thanks! On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:15:48 +0100, Toni Menzel <[email protected]> wrote: > yep, looks good! thanks! > > Toni > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Matt Pavlovich > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I submitted my patch to Git. I'm new to git and would appreciate it if >> someone could take a quick look and make sure I did it properly. >> >> Thanks! >> Matt >> >> On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:39:24 +0100, Toni Menzel <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Does pax-url-aether not fit your needs? This is -once we can reduce the >> > dependency stack a bit more- the future. >> > I think when speaking of pax-url-maven you mean pax-url-mvn..? >> > On Dec 6, 2010 11:33 PM, "Matt Pavlovich" <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> All- >> >> >> >> I'm working on a simple patch to not add the statically declared >> >> DEFAULT_REPOSITORIES >> (http://osgi.sonatype.org/content/groups/pax-runner) >> >> to the list of repositories used by pax-url-maven as long as a user >> >> has >> >> defined a repository in the external properties file, or specified >> >> maven >> >> settings.xml. This hopes to solve 2 issues. >> >> >> >> Issue 1. Users using software that uses pax-url-maven behind a proxy >> will >> >> experience weird issues. proxySupport is available as a configuration >> >> option, but it isn't well documented. >> >> >> >> Issue 2. Users cannot "lock down" the list of repositories and >> > dependencies >> >> that will be pulled in by pax-url-maven, because there is no way to >> > disable >> >> the DEFAULT_REPOSITORIES. >> >> >> >> I created a JIRA: >> >> JIRA: http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXURL-92 >> >> >> >> I'm planning on having this fix tested and updated this week, but it >> > brings >> >> up a bigger question about pax-url-maven configuration and behavior as >> >> a >> >> whole. I'd be interested in hearing feedback from the community, but >> here >> >> is what I am thinking: >> >> >> >> Proposal 1. Removal of FALLBACK_REPOSITORIES and DEFAULT_REPOSITORIES. >> >> This would clean up and simplify the configuration of pax-url-maven >> >> and >> >> rely on people shipping products that use pax-url-maven and end-users >> >> to >> >> have one and only one list of repositories. In my opinion, having the >> >> statically defined repositories unnecessarily complicates things. >> >> >> >> Proposal 2. Auto-detection of proxy support if a proxy is configured >> >> and >> >> active in a Maven settings.xml file. I can't think of a scenario where >> >> a >> >> user would configure Maven to use a proxy, and pax-url-maven would not >> >> use >> >> a proxy on the same box. >> >> >> >> Feedback greatly appreciated. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Matt Pavlovich >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> general mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >>
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
