On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 06:47:48AM -0600, Pete Carapetyan wrote:
>    re: pax-construct - One of many "adjustments" I made on my end was to
>    replace the maven .classpath code with the much more straightforward
>    and workable m2eclipse classpath container stuff.
> 
>    Is there a large contingent of people who use maven and eclipse and do
>    not use m2eclipse? If not, this would be something I would suggest.

well, at least me :) but I'm using eclipse:eclipse instead of pax:eclipse

kind regards,
andreas

>    On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Andreas Pieber <[1][email protected]>
>    wrote:
> 
>      No problem :)
>      I let this thread opened fur further discussions till sunday/monday
>      and then
>      I'll cut the release
>      kind regards,
>      andreas
> 
>    On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 10:45:23AM +0000, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
>    >    On 4 February 2011 04:04, Andreas Pieber
>    <[1][2][email protected]> wrote:
>    >
>    >      It seams that there have been some bug-fixes to pax-construct by
>    >      now. I think we
>    >      should draw another release of pax-construct; maybe a bugfix
>    release
>    >      (or a
>    >      minor)? WDYT? If noone feels responsible for doing this I can do
>    >      this on sunday.
>    >
>    >    I don't have time at the moment, so if you don't mind doing the
>    release
>    >    that would be great :)
>    >
>    >      kind regards,
>    >      andreas
>    >      _______________________________________________
>    >      general mailing list
> 
>      >      [2][3][email protected]
>      >      [3][4]http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>      >
>      >    --
>      >    Cheers, Stuart
>      >
>      > References
>      >
>      >    1. mailto:[5][email protected]
>      >    2. mailto:[6][email protected]
>      >    3. [7]http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> 
>    > _______________________________________________
>    > general mailing list
>    > [8][email protected]
>    > [9]http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> 
>      _______________________________________________
>      general mailing list
>      [10][email protected]
>      [11]http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> 
> References
> 
>    1. mailto:[email protected]
>    2. mailto:[email protected]
>    3. mailto:[email protected]
>    4. http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>    5. mailto:[email protected]
>    6. mailto:[email protected]
>    7. http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>    8. mailto:[email protected]
>    9. http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>   10. mailto:[email protected]
>   11. http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Attachment: pgpWp7zYNsf4y.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to