no preferences too
On Feb 16, 2011 1:37 PM, "Peter Neubauer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> No preference really.
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Achim Nierbeck
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Same for me, as long as it runs I'm fine.
>> But I guess we do get a better longterm support for Jenkins :)
>>
>> 0.02€ from me :)
>> Achim
>>
>> 2011/2/16 Toni Menzel <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I honestly don't care.  One that works fine would be good enough for me
>>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>> If i had to choose, I wonder if Nexus would be a better choice given
>>>> we all rely on maven and given the works Sonatype is putting in it.
>>>
>>> New Nexus CI ?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:14, Toni Menzel <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>>> > Gang,
>>>> > i know, the server is not yet ready for install but i would like to
>>>> > start a
>>>> > vote (informal) about what people would prefer when it comes to the
CI
>>>> > instance:
>>>> > - Hudson
>>>> > - Jenkins
>>>> > Our CI Servers should deploy "somewhere". I would prefer a local
Nexus
>>>> > instance. (Just for CI Builds + Dependencies to non final 3party -say
>>>> > ASF-
>>>> > artifacts during development).
>>>> > --
>>>> > Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > general mailing list
>>>> > [email protected]
>>>> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> general mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> general mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> general mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to