ahem, about the thing you mentioned (bug or not): yes, was not correct before. Thanks again. Though in M1 i wanted to make the low level api (called plumbing) solid. So there are still issues on the reactor-side. (tbd)
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com> wrote: > Thanks, Sahoo! > > Glad you look into Exam2. To explain the current status: > Exam2 was forked about a year ago from Exam1. It is meant to be a > cleanroom, very customizable osgi testcontainer swiss armies snife and > detach from Exam1's strength but also most prominent drawback: tight > coupling to Pax Runner + Junit4 API. > Both is done already, now after M1 release (december) i did not touch much > so far. > > But, things are moving, i am (at least this full week) full time on Exam2. > Most work is currently undergoing in dependency projects (Pax Tinybundles + > Pax Repository (new)) which will be incorporated these days. > > Once this is done we are heading a Milestone 2 release. After M2, i want to > consider Exam1 fully deprecated and just concentrate on Exam2. > This is really the point i want to hit as fast as possible, so we can go > back to organized things (Issue-Tracker driven development). > > Toni > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Sanjeeb Sahoo <www.sa...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I am trying pax-exam2. I wrote a custom TestContainer and it is getting >> initialized and tests are running, but I don't see TestContainer.cleanup() >> method being called. Only stop() is called. Is this a bug? >> >> Thanks, >> Sahoo >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> general@lists.ops4j.org >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> > > > -- > *Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com* > -- *Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com*
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
