yep. But technically that should be optional. But base will be released, too.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com> wrote: > BTW, I've just seen that you also have to release the base packages in > order to get out pax-runner-1.7 :) > > Kind regards, > Andreas > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com> wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > i need to make a couple of releases in order to kick out a RC for Pax > Exam > > 2.0 > > The only direct dependency is Pax URL 1.2.6 and Pax Runner 1.7 (because > of > > the new Aether stuff). > > So, those are the ones that will get a release, perhaps already today, > but > > possibly tomorrow. > > Question: any objections or issues with those ? > > I am currently trying to port Karaf to Exam2 but so far having problems > > fighting the build. > > So, once that is done, i will share & release the RC. > > Maybe someone from Karaf (Guillaume, Andreas) ? Can help out? > > Toni > > _______________________________________________ > > general mailing list > > general@lists.ops4j.org > > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > -- *Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com*
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
