Hi Niclas, I'd say a new artifact. In Pax Web we do have also a SPI bundle which looks like it grew over time with additional stuff.
so +1 for new Artefact regards, Achim Am 29.05.2011 14:55, schrieb Niclas Hedhman:
Gang, The Pax Logging SPI is not really supported yet, although it is used internally. When I am now looking at creating a logback-backed service implementation, it would be good to move the SPI elsewhere. So, the question is; Should I just stick it into Pax Logging API or create a new artifact that will almost always be needed? Cheers
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
