oha... wrong comment to wrong thread :) I'm adding the issue type right now (sry for the noise)
Kind regards, Andreas On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK, what are the next steps and who is willing to take responsibility :) > > Kind regards, > Andreas > > On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org> wrote: >> I concur. There are a lot of this in Pax. >> >> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hey, >>> >>> Since we make heavy use of the JIRA changelog and should also record >>> dependency upgrades it would definitely help/make it clearer if we >>> introduce a new, own issue type for this action. I'm using this on >>> various projects and I'm quite happy with this notation. WDYT? >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Andreas >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> general mailing list >>> general@lists.ops4j.org >>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer >> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java >> >> I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk >> I work here; http://tinyurl.com/24svnvk >> I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> general@lists.ops4j.org >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> > _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
