Regarding Exam 2.3: i haven't looked at all details yet but things look
really good! Thanks Harald for the numerous contributions and ongoing work.
Looking forward to talking to you guys next week !

Btw, is anyone of the german/austria/swiss folks going to the osgi user
forums [1] and/or [2]

[1] http://germany.osgiusers.org/Main/Veranstaltungen
[2] http://www.osgi.org/CommunityEvent2011/HomePage ?

We don't have any OPS4J Talks this year but i will try to attend at least
one. - would be great to have a beer with one or the other ops4j-ler, too.

Toni

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Harald Wellmann <[email protected]>wrote:

> The current snapshots of Pax Exam contain a number of new features and
> bugfixes significant enough for a new release 2.3.0, hopefully some time in
> September when Toni is back - there are some loose ends I would like to
> discuss with him in detail before heading for the next release.
>
> Pax Exam snapshots depend on
>
>  Pax Runner   1.7.5-SNAPSHOT
>  Pax URL      1.3.5-SNAPSHOT,
>
> so these will have to be released first.
>
> What's the status of the Pax Runner 1.8 branch? Should all changes on
> master (= 1.7.x) be merged into 1.8.x? Or are the changes sufficiently
> non-trivial for the next release to be Pax Runner 1.8.0 instead of 1.7.5?
>
> Same question for Pax URL - the "reference:" protocol is a new feature,
> which might be a reason to bump the version number to 1.4.0 instead of
> 1.3.5.
>
> Best regards,
> Harald
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/**mailman/listinfo/general<http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general>
>



-- 
Toni Menzel Source <http://tonimenzel.com>
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to