+1 for releasing them from the same staging repo. Otherwise good luck for PR 1.7.5 :-)
Kind regards, Andreas On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 08:55, Harald Wellmann <[email protected]>wrote: > Am 01.09.2011 09:06, schrieb Andreas Pieber: > > >> (h) Does this version already include all the changes you >> were planning to do to make the next Pax Runner release work >> more smoothly? If anything is missing, I'm ready to help out... >> >> >> Thank you very much, but except from your request for the m2e >> configuration everything should be included :-) Once this is in >> we can go ahead and release master-2.0.0. >> >> > I've added the m2e stuff to the master POM and changed Pax Runner and Pax > Exam to use master 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT as parent. The CI builds are ok. > > The next project waiting to be released is Pax Runner 1.7.5, so I suggest > this will be the guinea pig for the new master POM. > > If we release the Master and Pax Runner from the same staging repository, > this will give us a chance to fix the master in case it causes any problems > during the release of Pax Runner. > > Best regards, > Harald > > > ______________________________**_________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/**mailman/listinfo/general<http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general> >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
