Hi Matt I have no experience of Pax Logging but we chose Logback as the logging implementation for Eclipse Virgo and we have been pleased with the results. I recommend the Logback documentation if you haven't seen it already - it's very clear and readable. I know some people have tried Pax Logging on top of Logback in Virgo, but I don't have any details. The natural interface for logging to Logback is slf4j, but a number of alternative are available via various adapters. Most recently, we added OSGi Log Service support.
Hope that's some help! Regards, Glyn On Wednesday, 7 December 2011 at 20:46, Toni Menzel wrote: > For starters, LogBack is a Logging implementation, right ? > Pax Logging is a capture-all logging service for all major interfaces and > does provide a minimalistic implementation. But you want to use Pax Logging + > Logback in an OSGi scenario. Thats at least what i know of Logback. > Most of that knowledge i pull from times where log4j was hot. So i might be > wrong if log back might actually replace pax logging in some ways. That i > don't know. > > @Matt, you are sure cross posting this on felix, aries and ops4j ? > > cheers, Toni > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Matt Madhavan <mattmadha...@gmail.com > (mailto:mattmadha...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to know the Pros and cons of PaxLogging vs Logback. I have > > used PaxLogging a lot but the my client's Enterprise team (different team) > > that sets directions, would like to use Logback. > > > > Can someone let me know what are the pros and cons between the two and > > especially in the OSGi world? > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > Matt > > > > -- > Toni Menzel Source (http://tonimenzel.com) > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org (mailto:general@lists.ops4j.org) > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
