Hey, On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:20, Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com> wrote:
> Before taking out Pax Runner as a container we will make sure to make > profiles available across all containers. > On the other hand i think with Pax Exam 3 we may still ship the Pax Runner > container but not make special efforts to change/improve it. > I'm also +1 on that. Most ppl are quite happy with the current functionality of pax runner. As long as we maintain it executable with exam this should be fine (for me at least :-)). For everything else we really should try to rather make the native options better instead of "wasting" time in the runner. Kind regards, Andreas > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Sathyakumar Seshachalam < > sathyakumar_seshacha...@trimble.com> wrote: > >> Hi,**** >> >> ** ** >> >> As I understand pax runner container is now deprecated and will >> eventually be removed in Pax Exam 3.0 along with pax runner container only >> options. Now my projects are Spring DM based and the profile option of pax >> runner was really really helpful. Any suggestions as to how profiles can be >> done for native containers ?**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Regards**** >> >> Sathya**** >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> general@lists.ops4j.org >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> > > > -- > Toni Menzel Source <http://tonimenzel.com> > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
